Where do we draw the line between ourselves and nature? For some, it may be instantaneous, ruled by strict definitions and observations — after all, we are not by definition trees, nor sand, or sunshine. For others, the line may be looser, guided by feeling, an intuition and deep reverence for the elements that bind us together as one.
This question is explored in the work of Australian artist Matthew Graeme Johnson. His latest exhibition Continuum presents a harmonious coming together of human, sun and sea. Through the lens of his camera, Johnson uses the reflection of sunlight on the ocean’s surface as his medium, as well as the movements and variables proposed by himself and the elements. Through this method, the artist represents himself and the natural environment as one; blurring the traditional boundaries between artist and subject. Thus, his creative process relies entirely on his relationship, connection and understanding of the natural resources around him.
There is no divide, 2019 challenges the notion of binary constructs between humans and nature. The work is weighted by a bold, wavering vertical line, which travels straight through the piece. It was conceived over an 8 second exposure, capturing a fast, direct ‘swipe’ of half of the sun before it slipped behind a cloud, opposed to its reflection on the ocean. The line’s edges bleed and expand in a similar way to when shapes form and melt behind closed eyelids in the sun. Around it, other gestural marks are inscribed, crosshatched and marked on either side of the line’s boundary.
Johnson’s line bares a similar resemblance to the ‘zips’ of American painter Barnett Newman, who is recognised for his fundamental contributions to Abstract Expressionism. Newman created his ‘zips’ as a kind of symbol in an effort for them to reach out and invoke the viewers who would stand before them — sparking them with the fire of life. Perhaps the line in There is no divide urges viewers to step over and out of preconceived boundaries that arise between humans and nature. Perhaps, the line exists only to be crossed.